Sains Malaysiana 53(1)(2024): 39-48
http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2024-5301-04
Joint Action of Selective Herbicides Used in Paddy Field on Control of Lemna minor L.
(Tindakan Bersama Racun Herbisid Terpilih Digunakan di Sawah Padi terhadap Kawalan Lemna minor L.)
CHUAH, T.S.1,
LIM, S.W. 2 & DILIPKUMAR, M.3
1Faculty
of Plantation and Agrotechnology, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perlis Branch, 02600 Arau, Perlis,
Malaysia
2Department
of Biological Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030
Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
3Inbred Rice Program, Rice Research
Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI),
MARDI Seberang Perai, 13200 Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang,
Malaysia
Received: 5 May 2023/Accepted: 31
August 2023
Abstract
To minimise herbicide inputs, reduce environmental
burdens, and delay the evolution of herbicide resistance, it is of the utmost
significance to study the interaction between herbicides. This may be
accomplished by selecting the optimal combination, which, through synergy,
delivers more cost-effective weed control than a single herbicide. Under
laboratory conditions, interactions between binary mixtures of bensulfuron, propanil, 2,4-D, or bentazon on chlorophyll reduction of Lemna minor were investigated using the Additive Dose Model. Mixtures of propanil/2,4-D resulted in low antagonism whereas strong
antagonism was evident in bensulfuron-methyl/propanil. Combinations of bensulfuron/bentazon and bensulfuron/2,4-D led to moderate antagonism. By
contrast, propanil in combination with bentazon demonstrated a modest degree of synergism. The
findings of this study could provide good guideline and insights when mixing
two herbicides for weed control in rice fields and other aquatic environment.
Keywords:
Antagonism; joint-action; synergism; tank mixture
Abstrak
Kajian mengenai tindakan bersama racun herba adalah amat penting untuk mengurangkan kegunaan racun herba, mengurangkan masalah alam sekitar dan melambatkan evolusi kerintangan racun herba. Ini boleh dicapai dengan memilih campuran optimum melalui tindakan sinergistik yang memberikan kawalan rumpai yang lebih berkesan kos daripada racun herba tunggal. Penyelidikan ini dijalankan untuk menilai interaksi antara campuran binari bensulfuron, propanil, 2,4-D, atau bentazon terhadap pengurangan klorofil pada Lemna minor dengan menggunakan Model Dos Tambahan dalam keadaan makmal. Campuran bensulfuron/propanil, bensulfuron/bentazon, bensulfuron/2,4-D dan propanil/2,4-D menyebabkan antagonisme yang rendah hingga kuat. Namun, sinergisme yang sederhana diperoleh pada campuran propanil dan bentazon. Hasil kajian ini dapat memberi panduan dan kefahaman apabila menggabungkan dua racun herba untuk kawalan rumpai di sawah padi dan persekitaran akuatik yang lain.
Kata kunci: Antagonisme; sinergisme; tangki campuran; tindakan bersama
REFERENCES
Alebrahim, M.T., Kalkhoran,
E.S. & Tseng, T-M.P. 2023. Joint action of herbicides on weeds and their
risk assessment on earthworm (Eisenia fetida L.). In New Insights in Herbicide
Science, edited by Mendes, K.F. IntechOpen Publishing.
Barbieri, G.F.,
Young, B.G., Dayan, F.E., Streibig, J.C., Takano,
H.K., Merotto, A. & Avila, L.A. 2022. Herbicide
mixtures: Interactions and modeling. Advances in Weed Science 40(1): e02022005.
Bianchi, L., Anunciato,
V.M., Gazola, T., Perissato,
S.M., de Carvalho Dias, R., Tropaldi,
L., Carbonari, C.A. & Velini, E.D. 2020. Effects
of glyphosate and clethodim alone and in mixture in sourgrass (Digitaria insularis). Crop Protection 138: 105322
Chitband, A.A., Ghorbani, R., Hassan, M. & Mahbubeh Nabizade, M. 2019. Joint action of some
broadleaf herbicides in sugar beet. Pest Management Science 67(3): 179-186.
Devine,
M.D., Bestman, H.D. & Vanden Born, W.H. 1990. Physiological basis for different phloem mobilities of chlorsulfuron and clopyralid. Weed Science 38(1): 1-9.
Gerardo, R. & de Lima, I.P.
2022. Monitoring Duckweeds (Lemna minor)
in small rivers using sentinel-2 satellite imagery: Application of vegetation
and water indices to the Lis River (Portugal). Water 14(15): 2284.
Hatzios, K.K.
& Penner, D. 1985. Interaction of herbicides with
other agrochemicals in higher plants. Reviews
of Weed Science. 1: 1-63.
Herrera-Herrera, A.V., Asensio-Ramos, M.,
Hernández-Borges, J. & Rodríguez-Delgado, M.Á. 2016. Pesticides and
herbicides: Types, uses, and determination of herbicides. Encyclopedia
of Food and Health. pp. 326-332.
Jugulam, M. & Shyam, C.
2019. Non-target-site resistance to herbicides: Recent developments. Plants 8(10):
417.
Kaushik,
S., Inderjit, Streibig,
J.C. & Cedergreen, N. 2007. Activities of
mixtures of soil-applied herbicides with different molecular targets. Pest Management Science 62(11):
1092-1097.
Kim,
S. & Vanden Born, W.H. 1997. Carbon allocation
and translocation in chlorsulfuron-treated canola (Brassica napus). Weed Science 45: 466-469.
Kim,
S. & Vanden Born, W.H. 1996. Chlorsulfuron decreases both assimilate export by source leaves and import by sink leaves in
canola (Brassica napus) seedlings. Pesticide
Biochemistry and Physiology 5: 141-148.
Kudsk, P. & Mathiassen,
S.K. 2003. Joint action of amino acid biosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Research 44: 313-322.
Lancaster,
S., Jugulam, M. & Jones, J.F. 2021. Herbicide
Mode of Action. Kansas State University. (C715).
https://bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/Item.aspx?catId=236&pubId=172
Mahajan, G. & Chauhan, B.S.
2015. Weed control in dry direct-seeded rice using tank mixtures of herbicides
in South Asia. Crop Protection 72: 90-96.
Martins, R.X., Vieira, L., Souza, J.A.C.R., Silva, M.G.F., Muniz, M.S.,
Souza, T., Queiroga, F.R., Machado, M.R.F., da Silva,
P.M. & Farias, D. 2021. Exposure to 2,4-D herbicide induces hepatotoxicity
in zebrafish larvae. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C:
Toxicology & Pharmacology 248: 109110.
Matzenbacher, F.O., Kalsing,
A., Dalazan, G., Markus, C. & Merotto Jr., A. 2015. Antagonism is the predominant effect of herbicide mixture used
for imidazoline-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli)
control. Planta Daninha33(3): 587-597.
Merritt, L.H., Ferguson, J.C.,
Brown-Johnson, A.E., Reynolds, D.B., Tseng, T-M. & Lowe, J.W. 2020. Reduced
herbicide antagonism of grass weed control through Spray Application
Technique. Agronomy 10(8): 1131.
Meyer, C.J., Norsworthy, J.K. & Kruger, G.R.
2020. Antagonism in mixtures of glufosinate +
glyphosate and glufosinate + clethodim on grasses. Weed Technology 35(1): 12-21.
Ohio State University Extension. 2020. Weed Control
Guide for Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. Bulletin
789.
Ottis, B.V., Mattice,
J.D. & Talbert, R.E. 2005. Determination of antagonism between cyhalofop-butyl and other rice (Oryza sativa) herbicides in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Journal of
Agriculture and Food Chemistry 53: 4064-4068.
Rao,
V.S. 2002. Principles of Weed Science. 2nd ed. New Hampshire: Science
Publishers.
Scherder,
E.E., Talbert, R.E. & Lovelacc, M.I. 2005.
Antagonism of cyhalofop grass activity by halosulfuron, triclopyr, and propanil. Weed Technology 19: 934-941.
Song, Y. 2013. Insight into the
mode of action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) as an herbicide. Journal
of Integrative Plant Biology 56(2): 106-113.
Sørensen,
H., Cedergreen, N., Skovgaard, I. & Streibig, J. 2007.
An isobole – based statistical model and test for
synergism/antagonism in binary mixture toxicity experiments. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 14: 383-397.
Tiwari, B., Kharwar, S. & Tiwari, D.N. 2019.
Pesticides and rice agriculture. In Cyanobacteria: From Basic Science to
Application, edited by Mishra, A.K., Tiwari, D.N. & Rai,
A.N. Massachusetts: Academic Press. pp. 303-325.
Vølund, A. 1992. Dose response
surface bioassay. In XVIth International Biometric Conference, Vol II. Hamilton, New
Zealand. p. 249.
Willingham, S.D., Senseman, S.A., McCauley,
G.N. & Chandler, J.M. 2008. Effect of temperature and propanil on penoxsulam efficacy, absorption, and translocation
in alligatorweed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). Weed Science 56: 780-784.
Zhang, J., Hamill, A.S. &
Weaver, S.E. 1995. Antagonism and synergism between herbicides: Trends from
previous studies. Weed Technology 9:
86-90.
*Corresponding author; email:
chuahts@uitm.edu.my
|